2021 NASCO/NAAG Conference

The annual NASCO conference will be held virtually this year over two consecutive afternoons on October 13-14, 2021.

Members of the public/sector are invited to join us on October 13, 2021 from 1-5 EST, we will be holding interactive panels on recent enforcement actions and regulator priorities, fundraising, and ways in which regulators are working with the sector to weather the current economic challenges.  October 14 from 12-5 EST, will be for regulators only, and we will hear from various NASCO committees (including Education, Sham PACs, Multistate, Crowdfunding), and get your input on priorities for the coming year.  We’ll be supplementing some of the training we usually have at the conference with additional webinars throughout the year.  More details coming as the develop and specific times are subject to change.

Fraudulent charity shut down in Kansas, ordered to pay damages

A Georgia man and his Kansas charity have been banned from doing business in Kansas and ordered to pay more than $11,000 in damages for violating the Kansas Charitable Organizations and Solicitations Act, Attorney General Derek Schmidt said today.

Steven Beck of Ludowici, Georgia, and A Ride for the Wounded, Inc., a Kansas charity, were permanently banned from doing business in Kansas. Shawnee County District Court Judge Thomas Luedke this week approved a default judgment after Beck and the charity failed to respond to a lawsuit filed by Schmidt’s office.

Luedke ordered Beck and the charity to pay $11,029.05 for funds that were used for personal expenses in violation of the Kansas Charitable Organizations and Solicitations Act.

Schmidt urged Kansans to do their homework when donating to charities and offered the following tips to keep in mind when making charitable contributions:

  • Ask for written information, including how much of the money raised is actually used for charitable purposes and how much will end up in the hands of the professional fundraiser.
  • Be careful with telemarketers requesting contributions – oftentimes the telemarketer keeps a substantial portion of the donation.
  • Do not be pressured into making a contribution or pledge.
  • Do not feel obligated to send a donation to charities that send token gifts such as key chains, greeting cards, mailing labels, etc.
  • Make certain the charitable organization actually serves the need it claims to serve.
  • Ask for financial statements of the organization to determine who will benefit from the donations.
  • Make a personal giving plan and support well established charities on your terms, not in response to marketing solicitations.
  • Check out the charity at www.kscharitycheck.org to assess whether it is registered to solicit in Kansas and to see important aspects of its financial filings, including how much of any money you give will be spent on the charity’s overhead expenses rather than going to support the charitable purpose, such as disaster-relief efforts. However, note that some charities are exempt by law from registration.

Wasden Issues Warning over Charitable and Attorney Solicitations Following Rigby School Shooting

Attorney General Lawrence Wasden is warning Idahoans about scam fundraisers related to the recent shooting at Rigby Middle School. Victims and their families also should be cautious if they receive legal representation solicitations about filing lawsuits or joining potential class actions.

Idaho’s charity laws prohibit misleading charitable solicitations and authorize the Office of the Attorney General to investigate and bring legal actions against organizations or people who misrepresent the purpose of charitable donations or who misuse charitable assets. Consumer protection laws help protect Idahoans from deceptive advertising of goods and services, including legal assistance.

“Unfortunately, some people take advantage of tragedies to exploit victims’ pain and capitalize on the public’s generosity,” Wasden said. “I encourage individuals to file a complaint with my office if they become aware of suspicious fundraising attempts or misleading legal solicitations.”

Donors who have lost money or who want to report a scam charity, solicitation, or legal representation advertisement may file a complaint through the Attorney General’s website at www.ag.idaho.gov, or by calling the office’s Consumer Protection Division at 208-334-2424 or 1-800-432-3545 (toll free in Idaho).

Shootings nationwide have prompted scores of lawsuits, including class actions. Within days of these tragedies, victims or their families may be pressured into signing representation contracts.

Attorney solicitations are governed under the Idaho Rules of Professional Conduct for lawyers, which recognize that targeted in-person, telephone, or real-time electronic communications of potential clients can be abusive. Lawyers may not solicit professional employment through such methods unless the person contacted is a lawyer or has a family, friend, or prior professional relationship with the soliciting lawyer.

Written communications soliciting professional employment must be marked as “Advertising Material.” Advertising that misrepresents the sender’s qualifications, the purpose of the ad, or the status or effect of a legal action violates the Idaho Consumer Protection Act and should be reported to the Attorney General.

When deciding whether to donate money to a charity or contribute towards a fundraising campaign, donors should consider the following tips:

  • Research before giving. Important background information about charities is available online. Donors can review the charity’s tax-exempt status and IRS financial filings at www.irs.gov. Financial records inform the public about a charity’s mission and show how a charity spends its money. Giving to an organization that spends most of its money on furthering its charitable purpose is better than donating to one that spends the bulk of its funds on administrative costs and employee compensation. Other websites that rate charities include the BBB’s Wise Giving Alliance and Guidestar.
  • Question telemarketers and don’t give money over the phone. Charities sometimes use paid “telefunders” to help them raise money. Donors should ask questions and request written information from such callers before deciding whether to donate. Never agree to donate over the phone and hang up on callers who use pressure tactics to get immediate contributions. It is often best to ignore calls from unknown numbers.
  • Don’t click links in email solicitations and watch out for “look alike” websites. Links in unsolicited emails, or spam, can be very dangerous. They may contain malware that harms digital devices or takes the recipient to unsecure or fraudulent websites. Always visit a charity’s website directly to donate money. Fraudulent websites with slightly different web addresses than the legitimate charity’s website can scam donors out of their personal information or install malware or spyware on devices.
  • Be wary of crowdfunding campaigns and social network fundraising. Crowdfunding can be a great way to fundraise, but it also is an attractive tool for scammers. Before donating to a crowdfunding campaign or through a social network solicitation, donors should question the person collecting the funds and find out (a) what percentage of donations will be used for the charitable purpose, (b) the amount of any added fees, and (c) what percentage of a donation goes to the platform website. Remember, donations to individuals are not tax-deductible.
  • Protect personal identifying and financial information. Never give Social Security or driver’s license numbers, birthdates, or other private information to a solicitor. When donating to an organization through its website, use a credit card with a low credit limit and that protects against fraud. Read the charity’s privacy policy to find out how the charity may use donors’ personal information.

Don’t send money orders or buy gift cards. Never donate to a person or organization that asks for money orders or gift cards. Reputable charities accept checks or credit cards. They do not instruct donors to buy gift cards.

Attorney General James Wins Dismissal of NRA’s Fraudulent Bankruptcy, Fight for Dissolution to Continue in New York

NEW YORK – New York Attorney General Letitia James today scored a major victory in her case against the National Rifle Association (NRA) when a federal bankruptcy court in Texas rejected the organization’s claims of bankruptcy after the NRA sought to reorganize in Texas, stating, “that the NRA did not file the bankruptcy petition in good faith.” Despite its attempts to escape New York’s jurisdiction, Attorney General James will now continue to pursue her enforcement action against the NRA, in addition to seeking a number of other forms of relief she requested when initially filing her lawsuit last summer.

“Weeks of testimony have demonstrated that the NRA and Wayne LaPierre simply filed chapter 11 bankruptcy to avoid accountability,” said Attorney General James. “This trial underscored that the NRA’s fraud and abuse continued long after we filed our lawsuit. Without a doubt, the board was deceived when bankruptcy language was hidden in Mr. LaPierre’s contract earlier this year. Today’s order reaffirms that the NRA does not get to dictate if and where it will answer for its actions. The rot runs deep, which is why we will now refocus on and continue our case in New York court. No one is above the law, not even one of the most powerful lobbying organizations in the country.”

Last August, Attorney General James filed a lawsuit against the NRA and four of the organization’s current or former top executives for failing to manage the NRA’s funds; failing to follow numerous state and federal laws, as well as the NRA’s own bylaws and policies; and contributing to the loss of more than $64 million in just three years. The suit was filed against the NRA as a whole, as well as Executive Vice-President Wayne LaPierre, former Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer Wilson “Woody” Phillips, former Chief of Staff and the Executive Director of General Operations Joshua Powell, and Corporate Secretary and General Counsel John Frazer.

This past January, in an effort to avoid accountability, the NRA filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy even though the organization still claimed to have healthy financial reserves. Over the course of the bankruptcy trial, LaPierre and other senior leaders admitted that the bankruptcy was simply a way of avoiding New York’s enforcement action, yet still stated that they believed that New York courts and judges could be trusted to fairly and impartially oversee the case.

In today’s decision, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Harlin Hale of the Northern District of Texas condemned the NRA’s attempts to avoid accountability, making clear that the organization’s actions were “not an appropriate use of bankruptcy.”

Specifically, Judge Hale said, “The question the Court is faced with is whether the existential threat facing the NRA is the type of threat that the Bankruptcy Code is meant to protect against. The Court believes it is not. For the reasons stated herein, the Court finds there is cause to dismiss this bankruptcy case as not having been filed in good faith both because it was filed to gain an unfair litigation advantage and because it was filed to avoid a state regulatory scheme. The Court further finds the appointment of a trustee or examiner would, at this time, not be in the best interests of creditors and the estate.”

Judge Hale also went on to specifically lay blame for the fraudulent bankruptcy at LaPierre’s feet: “What concerns the Court most though is the surreptitious manner in which Mr. LaPierre obtained and exercised authority to file bankruptcy for the NRA. Excluding so many people from the process of deciding to file for bankruptcy, including the vast majority of the board of directors, the chief financial officer, and the general counsel, is nothing less than shocking.”

The case against the NRA will proceed in the New York County State Supreme Court, where Attorney General James will continue to fight for the organization’s dissolution; for removal of two of its top leaders, LaPierre and Frazer; for full restitution of tens of millions of dollars from LaPierre, Phillips, Powell, and Frazer; for penalties; and for the four individuals to never be able to serve on the board of a charity in New York state again.

Lead trial counsel for the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) in this proceeding was Special Counsel for the Litigation Bureau Monica Connell, along with Bureau Chief James Sheehan, Bureau Co-Chiefs of the Enforcement Section Emily Stern and Yael Fuchs, and Assistant Attorneys General William Wang, Sharon Sash, Jonathan Conley, and Stephen Thompson — all of the Charities Bureau; with additional assistance from Legal Assistant Nyna Sargent and Assistant Attorneys General Peggy Farber of the Charities Bureau and Lucas McNamara of the Environmental Protection Bureau. The OAG was also represented in the bankruptcy proceeding by co-counsel Gerrit Pronske, Eric Van Horn, and Jason Kathman of Spencer Fane LLP. The Charities Bureau is a part of the Division for Social Justice, which is supervised by Chief Deputy Attorney General Meghan Faux and First Deputy Attorney General Jennifer Levy.

Attorney General Ellison sues company for posing as charity helping service members, funneling donations to owner

Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison today announced that his Office is suing a company calling itself Contributing 2 Combatants and Coast 2 Coast Marketing, and its owner, Jacob Choinski, for violating charitable-solicitation and consumer-protection laws by defrauding Minnesota donors. The lawsuit alleges that the company, formally named PNW C2C Marketing, LLC (“C2C”), went door to door in Minnesota neighborhoods and misrepresented that C2C was a nonprofit soliciting donations to send care packages to servicemembers overseas. The lawsuit further alleges that Choinski spent the funds collected for his personal use — and did not spend a single dollar on care packages since C2C’s inception in July 2018.  

“Choinski enriched himself by using C2C to exploit Minnesotans’ generosity in the name of benefiting military service members who are serving all of us overseas,” Attorney General Ellison said. “This conduct is truly despicable. Our military members serving overseas undertake a tremendous sacrifice from which we all benefit. I will continue to aggressively pursue every company and person that exploits our service members’ sacrifice and preys on Minnesotans’ generosity.” 

C2C is a for-profit Minnesota limited liability company that claims to sell the cost of shipping a care package to service members overseas through door-to-door solicitation. C2C claims to partner with a charity to which it provides funds from its sales. C2C claims that its partner charity then sends the care packages using the money it gives the charity.  

The AGO’s lawsuit alleges that C2C has not given any money to the nonprofit with which it supposedly partners, despite soliciting over $70,000 for Minnesotans since July 2018. Choinski, as C2C’s sole owner, instead used C2C to solicit door to door in Minnesota and keep all the money received for his own purposes.  

The lawsuit also alleges that C2C deceptively represents itself as a nonprofit while soliciting and asks Minnesotans for donations, tells Minnesotans that their donations are tax deductible, and misleads Minnesotans to believe that they can choose the gender of the service member who will receive a care package and the branch of military they wish to support. The lawsuit further alleges that Choinski has been affiliated with other companies that have been accused of the same conduct as C2C in Minnesota, Iowa, and the Dakotas.

C2C has solicited throughout the Minneapolis–Saint Paul metro area, Greater Minnesota, and other states. The lawsuit, filed in Ramsey County District Court, asserts that C2C and Choinski have violated Minnesota’s Charitable Solicitation Act, the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, and the Consumer Fraud Act.