Attorney General Ellison asks court to remove trustees of Otto Bremer Trust

August 12, 2020 (SAINT PAUL) — After a months-long investigation, Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison today asked a court to remove the trustees of the Otto Bremer Trust (OBT), Brian Lipschultz, Daniel Reardon, and Charlotte Johnson.    

Two petitions and an associated memorandum of law filed in Ramsey County Probate Court today detail the trustees’ serious breaches of fiduciary duty, their longstanding failure to administer the trust effectively and in accordance with the directives of its founder, and multiple violations of state laws governing charitable trusts — culminating in a reckless hostile takeover attempt of the OBT’s primary asset, Bremer Financial Corporation (BFC), in October 2019.  

The petition does not weigh in on BFC’s or any other party’s claims or conduct. Attorney General Ellison is, however, simultaneously asking the court to stay the lawsuits between the trustees and the BFC-related parties until his petition is decided. 

“Minnesotans care about and for each other: they want each other to be able to afford their lives and live with dignity and respect, just as they want for themselves. Minnesotans trust charitable trusts to play an important role in that goal. Otto Bremer directed that the trust in his name not be used for ‘any purpose’ other than charitable. The trustees’ actions have abused his trust and Minnesotans’ trust,” Attorney General Ellison said. 

“I do not take this action lightly,” Attorney General Ellison continued. “But as the chief law officer of the state and supervisor of charitable trusts in Minnesota, I have the duty to make sure charitable assets are used properly and for the benefit of the public, not the private aims and personal enrichment of the trustees. Because the trustees’ misconduct is particularly serious, it requires particularly serious action by my Office.” 

The mission that Otto Bremer set for the trust, as outlined in the trust instrument, includes to “relieve poverty in the City of St. Paul, Minnesota,” “establish scholarship and assist poor and deserving children in securing education, to “promote citizenship, to “promote the public health, and to “aid persons suffering from catastrophe,” among other aims. 

Attorney General Ellison brings this action today under the power and authority the Legislature has conferred on the Attorney General to supervise and regulate nonprofits, as the chief law officer of the state, and as the representative of public’s interest in charitable trusts, of which the public is the beneficiary. 

The petition details how the trustees acted recklessly in their attempt to sell the trust’s BFC shares to a large number of out-of-state hedge funds, knowing it would trigger, in their words, “a cascade of unfortunate consequences.” Trustees’ attempt to engineer the sale of the bank enriched them significantly, exposed OBT to significant legal risk, and drained the trust of millions of dollars in expenses that should have been available for the charitable purposes of the trust. In the course of attempting to engineer the sale, contrary to the wishes of trust founder Otto Bremer as expressed in the instrument that governs OBT, trustees also withheld important information from the Attorney General’s Office so that the Office would not block their plans. By so doing, they attempted to undermine the legal authority of the Attorney General’s Office to ensure that OBT and all charitable trusts operate in strict accordance with the law. 

The 2019 sale followed a years-long attempt to reframe OBT’s “brand” from a charitable foundation to a finance-focused private-equity firm benefiting their private interests.  Across numerous aspects of the trust, the trustees elevated their own interests above serving its charitable purposes, including by: making self-interested grants to promote their status in the community, including million-dollar grants to charities with which they were personally affiliated; creating a hostile work environment for employees that exposed the trust to liability and created a universal fear of retaliation among employees; misusing charitable assets and self-dealing to run unrelated private businesses out of OBT’s offices; spending excessively on lavish office space and other overhead; paying themselves to redundant and unnecessary fees; significantly raising their own compensation without a corresponding rise in their duties; and creating and not remedying deficiencies in governance and oversight.  

The petition requests that the court remove the trustees and appoint new fiduciaries to investigate the allegations, manage the trust, and rebuild independent oversight over the trust.  It also seeks immediate remedies, including trustees’ immediate suspension or removal, to prevent ongoing harm to the trust like illegal investments, restructuring the trust to shield it from oversight and liability, and incurring tens of millions of dollars in legal fees.  

Attorney General Ellison is proposing that the court appoint Pamela AlexanderMarcia Avner, and Carleen Rhodes as interim trustees. Ms. Alexander is a retired judge of Hennepin County District Court, Ms. Avner is a former public policy director of the Minnesota Council on Nonprofits, and Ms. Rhodes is the former president and CEO of The Saint Paul Foundation and the Minnesota Community Foundation. 

The Court File Number for the case is 62-C9-61-315222.

Getting to Know NASCO: State Charity Officials, Your Mission and Your Board. A podcast interview with Yael Fuchs, President of the National Association of State Charity Officials.

The latest episode of the “Governing Health” podcast series features an interview with Yael Fuchs, President of the National Association of State Charity Officials.

Yael’s comments offer a useful platform from which to educate the board and management on the interests, concerns and enforcement priorities of these important state regulators.

The episode explores:

·         The role of NASCO and the value it provides to both not-for-profits and the offices of attorneys general, including recent publications available to help charities self-govern effectively

·         Governance areas of interest for the Charities Bureau of New York, including whistle-blowers, the work of the audit committee and related party transactions

·         Insights and lessons learned from recent enforcement actions that have particular relevance for not-for-profit board members today ·         The roles of state charity officials and board leadership as organizations

Getting to Know NASCO: State Charity Officials, Your Mission and Your Board
LISTEN NOW
https://www.nasconet.org/2020-nasco-naag-conference/

Additional agenda information is available here, and registration will be open the week of October 26.

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey urged consumers to use caution in giving to charities in the wake of Hurricane Laura.

West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey urged consumers to use caution in giving to charities in the wake of Hurricane Laura.

“The damage brought by Hurricane Laura to the Gulf Coast is heartbreaking,” Attorney General Morrisey said. “West Virginians are generous people. I encourage those who wish to contribute to disaster relief to do so, but give wisely so that your generosity helps those in need.”

Because criminals will fraudulently solicit charitable donations, those who want to give to a charity or organization should confirm it is registered with the proper state government office. People can access that information through the West Virginia Secretary of State’s Office or by contacting state officials in Louisiana and Texas. 

Consumers also can research charities online via www.charitynavigator.org or www.guidestar.org.

Additional tips to keep in mind when giving to disaster relief organizations: 

  • Never feel pressured to donate immediately.
  • Be suspicious of charities that ask for donations in cash, gift cards or via wire transfer.
  • Consider paying by credit card, which is the safest option for security and tax purposes.
  • Ask how much of an individual donation directly supports hurricane relief.
  • If the charity is unfamiliar, gather as much information as possible about the organization.
  • Never rely on a group’s sympathetic sounding name or its similarity to a well-known, reputable entity.
  • Be wary of unsolicited calls that thank you for donations that you do not recall making.
  • Verify any local chapter is authorized to solicit funds on behalf of its parent organization.
  • Go directly to a charity or organization’s website instead of clicking on a link to the desired group.
  • Any online contribution website should start with https://. The “s” verifies a secure connection, making it less likely for personal information to be stolen.
  • Be wary of any charity refusing to detail its mission, use of donations or proof of tax deductibility.
  • Keep records, including a letter confirming the charitable status of the organization, for contributions in excess of $250.

Any West Virginian solicited to donate to a charity they think may be fraudulent can contact the Attorney General’s Consumer Protection Division at 1-800-368-8808, the Eastern Panhandle Consumer Protection Office in Martinsburg at 304-267-0239 or visit the office online at www.wvago.gov.

District of Columbia AG files lawsuit against the NRA Foundation and the NRA for misuse of charitable funds

District of Columbia Attorney General Karl A. Racine filed a lawsuit against the NRA Foundation and the National Rifle Association (NRA) for misusing charitable funds to support wasteful spending by the NRA and its executives. The lawsuit alleges that the NRA Foundation violated District laws by allowing charitable funds to be used for noncharitable purposes, failing to operate independently, and placing the NRA’s interests ahead of its own charitable purposes. OAG also alleges that the Foundation’s Board of Directors was controlled by the NRA and allowed the NRA to exploit it through risky multi-million-dollar loans—including a $5 million loan that the NRA has never repaid. Additionally, the Foundation allegedly agreed to pay the NRA millions of dollars in fees without documentation of the work the NRA was performing or how it supported the Foundation’s charitable purposes. With this lawsuit, OAG is seeking to return the charitable funds improperly wasted on the NRA to the Foundation and a court order imposing changes to the Foundation to ensure it is operated independently and fulfills its charitable purposes.